Wednesday, May 31, 2006
Things in Iraq aren't so bad because things in Vietnam were worse
The mainstream media frequently gets accused of making the situation in Iraq appear worse than it actual is. One of the frequent justifications is to pull out statistics that show other wars have exacted a greater toll on both civilian and military than the current conflict. (See post below.) Therefore, the public and media shouldn't be so put out by this loss of life, because other wars were worse.
A few points in response to this argument:
We were told the war in Iraq would be short and painless.
We were lied to about the reasons for going to Iraq. And now, the reason is apparently to spread Democracy throughout the Middle East. Bait and switch angers the public.
We have no idea when this war will end. The objectives are fuzzy.
The loss of life has been tremendous. I don't care if its less than WWII.
The insurgency is not going away anytime soon.
Iraqi forces are not ready to take over.
Stories of US wrongdoing (Abu Ghraib, Haditha) are horrible and rightly infuriating to a public who wonders why we are in Iraq and how long we are going to stay.
Etc.
Therefore, the situation in Iraq is bad. ("But what about the schools!")
A few points in response to this argument:
We were told the war in Iraq would be short and painless.
We were lied to about the reasons for going to Iraq. And now, the reason is apparently to spread Democracy throughout the Middle East. Bait and switch angers the public.
We have no idea when this war will end. The objectives are fuzzy.
The loss of life has been tremendous. I don't care if its less than WWII.
The insurgency is not going away anytime soon.
Iraqi forces are not ready to take over.
Stories of US wrongdoing (Abu Ghraib, Haditha) are horrible and rightly infuriating to a public who wonders why we are in Iraq and how long we are going to stay.
Etc.
Therefore, the situation in Iraq is bad. ("But what about the schools!")
Time to pull out of Washington, DC
Fellow blogger and Saint Louisan Gateway Pundit resurrects this time tested canard, via Conservative news source NewsMax:
Well in that case, things in Iraq must not be that bad then.
Do we need to dissect the ludicrous nature of this argument? No, but just for the fun of it...
According to Newsmax, there are 27.51 violent deaths per 100,000 citizens. DC has 45 per 100,000.
A question for Newsmax: Were these deaths in DC the result of an angry insurgency that is lashing out against American forces and their allies?
Apparently, the loss of 27.51 civilians to violent deaths is okay, because, hey, DC is worse. Let's just agree that both death tolls are entirely too high and neither is acceptable.
Gateway Pundit reader Dave makes the point that if there were 150,000 coaltion troops stationed in DC the death rate should, and would, drop.
Add your own smackdown to this comparison in the comments section.
Iraq is less violent than Washington, DC
Well in that case, things in Iraq must not be that bad then.
Do we need to dissect the ludicrous nature of this argument? No, but just for the fun of it...
According to Newsmax, there are 27.51 violent deaths per 100,000 citizens. DC has 45 per 100,000.
A question for Newsmax: Were these deaths in DC the result of an angry insurgency that is lashing out against American forces and their allies?
Apparently, the loss of 27.51 civilians to violent deaths is okay, because, hey, DC is worse. Let's just agree that both death tolls are entirely too high and neither is acceptable.
Gateway Pundit reader Dave makes the point that if there were 150,000 coaltion troops stationed in DC the death rate should, and would, drop.
Add your own smackdown to this comparison in the comments section.
Mendacity
File this one under pragmatism, just please stop admiring Bush for his honesty.
Salesmen: Tales from the front lines
Read this fascinating editorial about the woes of modern day Bible salesmen.
Great companion piece to the classics Maysles documentary "Salesman."
Great companion piece to the classics Maysles documentary "Salesman."
Christian jiahd
Become a warrior for Christ in the new video game "Left Behind: Eternal Forces":
Let's list off more than a few of the disturbing aspects of this story.
First, let's go the game's official site which lists some highlights and objectives of the game:
Who are the enemies of the game? A Romanian Antichrist named Nicolai Carpathia. The dispensationalists are apparently nostalgic for the cold war. This European antichrist leads a group of Global Community Peacekeepers, aka the UN. This kind of simplistic political view led to much of the Christian community rallying around the Christian Bush against the evil New World Order of the UN and "old Europe" in the run-up to the war against Iraq.
What happens to those who don't convert as your paramilitary crusaders roam the streets of New York? You blow them away. Jihad, anyone?
This is jihadist propaganda clothed in Rockstar games syntax. This sort of vile propaganda is not Christian.
More here.
Praise the Lord and pass the ammunition: Christians are finally getting a high-caliber shoot-'em-up videogame of their own. Due out on PCs in the second half of 2006, Left Behind: Eternal Forces is the first game adapted from the blockbuster books by Tim LaHaye and Jerry Jenkins. Gamers familiar with the largely uninspiring and unprofitable history of Christian videogames will quickly notice two differences in Forces: the top-shelf design, which offers an eerily authentic reproduction of the game's Manhattan setting, and a level of violence reminiscent of Grand Theft Auto. The game revolves around New Yorkers who are "left behind" after the rapture. Players scour the streets for converts, training them into a work force to feed, shelter and join a paramilitary resistance against the growing forces of the Antichrist.
Left Behind Games CEO Troy Lyndon, whose company went public in February, says the game's Christian themes will grab the audience that didn't mind gore in "The Passion of the Christ." "We've thought through how the Christian right and the liberal left will slam us," says Lyndon. "But megachurches are very likely to embrace this game." Though it will be marketed directly to congregations, Forces will also have a secular ad campaign in gaming magazines.
Let's list off more than a few of the disturbing aspects of this story.
First, let's go the game's official site which lists some highlights and objectives of the game:
Wage a war of apocalyptic proportions in LEFT BEHIND: Eternal Forces - a real-time strategy game based upon the best-selling LEFT BEHIND book series created by Tim LaHaye and Jerry Jenkins. Join the ultimate fight of Good against Evil, commanding Tribulation Forces or the Global Community Peacekeepers, and uncover the truth about the worldwide disappearances!
Who are the enemies of the game? A Romanian Antichrist named Nicolai Carpathia. The dispensationalists are apparently nostalgic for the cold war. This European antichrist leads a group of Global Community Peacekeepers, aka the UN. This kind of simplistic political view led to much of the Christian community rallying around the Christian Bush against the evil New World Order of the UN and "old Europe" in the run-up to the war against Iraq.
What happens to those who don't convert as your paramilitary crusaders roam the streets of New York? You blow them away. Jihad, anyone?
This is jihadist propaganda clothed in Rockstar games syntax. This sort of vile propaganda is not Christian.
More here.
Tuesday, May 30, 2006
Bush's Memorial Day speech was horrible
From Bush's speech at Arlington Cemetery yesterday:
Bush continues to link ongoing war in Iraq with the attacks of September the 11th. By doing so, he implies that we are fighting in Iraq because we were attacked on 9-11 and that one justifies the other. The war of choice in Iraq, that Bush was not "reluctant" to undertake, was not justified by 9-11. Period.
Our president talks about the ongoing mission in which the soldiers are involved. It is safe to assume that this mission is the neverending, ill-defined war on terror. In the war on terror, who is the enemy? What are our objectives? When will we be finished?
Until Bush more clearly defines the objectives of this war, it will continue to be used as a blunt instrument to engage in preemptive warfare and erode civil liberties. It is for this war without end that our soldiers are dying. Objectives must be defined. The troops must be brought home, and a just anti-terrorism plan must be formed.
All who are buried here understood their duty. They saw a dark shadow on the horizon, and went to meet it. They understood that tyranny must be met with resolve, and that liberty is always the achievement of courage. Here, in the presence of veterans they fought with and loved ones whose pictures they carried, the fallen give silent witness to the price of our liberty -- and our nation honors them, this day and every day.
In this place where valor sleeps, we are reminded why America has always gone to war reluctantly, because we know the costs of war. We have seen those costs in the war on terror we fight today. These grounds are the final resting place for more than 270 men and women who have given their lives in freedom's cause since the attacks of September the 11th, 2001...
Our nation is free because of brave Americans like these, who volunteer to confront our adversaries abroad so we do not have to face them here at home. Our nation mourns the loss of our men and women in uniform; we will honor them by completing the mission for which they gave their lives -- by defeating the terrorists, by advancing the cause of liberty, and by laying the foundation of peace for a generation of young Americans.
Bush continues to link ongoing war in Iraq with the attacks of September the 11th. By doing so, he implies that we are fighting in Iraq because we were attacked on 9-11 and that one justifies the other. The war of choice in Iraq, that Bush was not "reluctant" to undertake, was not justified by 9-11. Period.
Our president talks about the ongoing mission in which the soldiers are involved. It is safe to assume that this mission is the neverending, ill-defined war on terror. In the war on terror, who is the enemy? What are our objectives? When will we be finished?
Until Bush more clearly defines the objectives of this war, it will continue to be used as a blunt instrument to engage in preemptive warfare and erode civil liberties. It is for this war without end that our soldiers are dying. Objectives must be defined. The troops must be brought home, and a just anti-terrorism plan must be formed.
"Written on the Wind"
Another fine Douglas Sirk melodrama. "Wind" examines spoiled oil millionaire Kyle Hadley (Robert Stack) and his fall as he violently fights against his self-perceived impotence. Helping him toward his downfall are his childhood friend Mitch Wayne(Rock Hudson), who has eyes for Hadley's new wife (Lauren Bacall). Dorothy Malone, in a bravura performance oozing sex, plays Hadley's sister Marylee who has eyes for Hudson.
Sirk makes masterful use of the brilliant and fanstastical Technicolor palette. As always, his composition is flawless. The movie, though, is pure melodrama so don't expect realism. This is life turned up to 11.
Highly recommended. Check out the Criterion edition to fully appreciate this Technicolor gem.
Sirk makes masterful use of the brilliant and fanstastical Technicolor palette. As always, his composition is flawless. The movie, though, is pure melodrama so don't expect realism. This is life turned up to 11.
Highly recommended. Check out the Criterion edition to fully appreciate this Technicolor gem.
Greatest American novels of the last quarter century
While we're talking best of lists, we might as well take a look at the New York Times Book Review recent "best of" list. The list sought to name the best American novels of the past twenty-five years. 125 authors were surveyed and Toni Morisson's "Beloved" received the most votes. An excellent choice that I have been shocked and dismayed to hear many Anglo readers dismiss. They have told me that it is an overrated black empowerment screed. Obviously, they have never read the book. It's a fascinating, beautifully constructed ghost story. If you have to name one "best of," it's certainly deserving.
"Blood Meridian," a thoroughly nasty novel by Cormac McCarthy, was one of the runners up in the list. A.O. Scott in writing the accompanying essay to the list makes the mistake of labeling "Meridian" as a historical novel:
"Meridian" uses the brutalily of the past to describe the present. The uncivilized American southwest of the novel gives man the ability to realize his true imperative: destruction. "Meridian" is not about a bygone, alien landscape, but is intead a book about the present stripped of its niceties and conventions--a past in which man fully realizes his depravity. The novel is brutally violent and utterly devoid of hope. It certainly wouldn't be in my list of great American works because the ideas it preaches--it is a very preachy novel--are false and destructive.
Like other "best of" lists this one has many omissions. Richard Powers is nowhere on the list. The original and brilliant Powers novel "Gain" is certainly worthy of inclusion, and any list that includes "The Plot Against America"--a page turner--should consider the Powers novel "The Time of Our Singing"--a fascinating study of race, relativity, and the transcending power of music.
"Empire Falls" and "Motherless Brooklyn" would have been deserving choices as well.
Glad to see "The Known World" in the mix, though. An outstanding novel that you must read now.
"Blood Meridian," a thoroughly nasty novel by Cormac McCarthy, was one of the runners up in the list. A.O. Scott in writing the accompanying essay to the list makes the mistake of labeling "Meridian" as a historical novel:
And while "Blood Meridian" is far too gnomic and nihilistic to claim such a therapeutic function for itself, it nonetheless shares with "Beloved" a vision of the past as an alien realm of extremity, in which human relations are stripped to the bare essentials of brutality and tenderness, vengeance and honor.
"Meridian" uses the brutalily of the past to describe the present. The uncivilized American southwest of the novel gives man the ability to realize his true imperative: destruction. "Meridian" is not about a bygone, alien landscape, but is intead a book about the present stripped of its niceties and conventions--a past in which man fully realizes his depravity. The novel is brutally violent and utterly devoid of hope. It certainly wouldn't be in my list of great American works because the ideas it preaches--it is a very preachy novel--are false and destructive.
Like other "best of" lists this one has many omissions. Richard Powers is nowhere on the list. The original and brilliant Powers novel "Gain" is certainly worthy of inclusion, and any list that includes "The Plot Against America"--a page turner--should consider the Powers novel "The Time of Our Singing"--a fascinating study of race, relativity, and the transcending power of music.
"Empire Falls" and "Motherless Brooklyn" would have been deserving choices as well.
Glad to see "The Known World" in the mix, though. An outstanding novel that you must read now.
50 greatest conservative rock songs
John J. Miller at National Review recently compiled a list of the 50 greatest conservative rock songs. His list is immediately loses credibility by his inclusion of Creed. Sure they're technically a rock band, but they don't belong in any greatest list. Might as well include songs by Live and Limp Bizkit while you're at it.
The greatest conservative rock song according to Miller: Won't Get Fooled Again by The Who. Why?
These lyrics sound more Chomsky than Buckley. I love when Conservatives pretend they are the revolutionaries--the above song is obviously a revolutionary anthem--as opposed to the old guard. A list of the greatest conservative rock would have to include a few cuts from Pat Boone's 1955 "rock" record. It defanged and desexed rock making it safe for the old guard and their kids. "Ain't That a Shame."
The greatest conservative rock song according to Miller: Won't Get Fooled Again by The Who. Why?
The conservative movement is full of disillusioned revolutionaries; this could be their theme song, an oath that swears off naïve idealism once and for all. “There’s nothing in the streets / Looks any different to me / And the slogans are replaced, by-the-bye. . . . Meet the new boss / Same as the old boss.” The instantly recognizable synthesizer intro, Pete Townshend’s ringing guitar, Keith Moon’s pounding drums, and Roger Daltrey’s wailing vocals make this one of the most explosive rock anthems ever recorded — the best number by a big band, and a classic for conservatives.
These lyrics sound more Chomsky than Buckley. I love when Conservatives pretend they are the revolutionaries--the above song is obviously a revolutionary anthem--as opposed to the old guard. A list of the greatest conservative rock would have to include a few cuts from Pat Boone's 1955 "rock" record. It defanged and desexed rock making it safe for the old guard and their kids. "Ain't That a Shame."
Monday, May 29, 2006
400th Post
So many thanks to go around. Want to take this time to thank the guys in R and D and my boys in the mail room. Keep up the good work.
Stories emerging of Haditha atrocities
Iraqis recount Marine murders in Haditha:
Hiba Abdullah survived the killings by American troops in Haditha last Nov. 19, but said seven others at her father-in-law's home did not. She said American troops shot and killed her husband, Rashid Abdul Hamid. They killed her father-in-law, Abdul Hamid Hassan Ali, a 77-year-old in a wheelchair, shooting him in the chest and abdomen, she said.
Her sister-in-law, Asma, "collapsed when her husband was killed in front of her eyes," Ms. Abdullah said. As Asma fell, she dropped her 5-month-old infant. Ms. Abdullah said she picked up the baby girl and sprinted out of the house, and when she returned, Asma was dead.
Four people who identified themselves as survivors of the killings in Haditha, including some who had never spoken publicly, described the killings to an Iraqi writer and historian who was recruited by The New York Times to travel to Haditha and interview survivors and witnesses of what military officials have said appear to be unjustified killings of two dozen Iraqis by marines. Some in Congress fear the killings could do greater harm to the image of the United States military around the world than the Abu Ghraib prison scandal.
The four survivors' accounts could not be independently corroborated, and it was unclear in some cases whether they actually saw the killings. But much of what they said was consistent with broad outlines of the events of that day provided by military and government officials who have been briefed on the military's investigations into the killings, which the officials have said are likely to lead to charges that may include murder and a cover-up of what really happened...
"People are so scared," he said. "They have lost confidence in the Americans. If the Americans show up in the neighborhood the insurgents will come and take away people they accuse of being stooges of the Americans."
But just over six months ago, 24 people in the Subhani district of Haditha faced a different death, witnesses and survivors say.
The killings began after 7:15 a.m., as the neighborhood was stirring awake, when insurgents detonated a roadside bomb in Subhani that killed Lance Cpl. Miguel Terrazas of El Paso, Tex., as his patrol drove through the area.
According to one United States defense official, who declined to be identified because details of the investigation are not supposed to be revealed, most of the subsequent killings are believed to have been committed by a handful of marines led by a staff sergeant who was their squad leader, although other marines are also under investigation.
In the home Ms. Abdullah escaped from, she said American troops also shot and killed a 4-year-old nephew named Abdullah Walid. She said her mother-in-law, Khumaysa Tuma Ali, 66, died after being shot in the back. Two brothers-in-law, Jahid Abdul Hamid Hassan and Walid Abdul Hamid Hassan, were also killed, she said.
In addition to Ms. Abdullah and Asma's baby, two others survived. One, 9-year-old Iman Walid Abdul Hamid, said she ran quickly, still clad in her pajamas, to hide under the bed with her younger brother, Abdul Rahman Walid Abdul Hamid, when she saw what was happening.
"We were scared and could not move for two hours. I tried to hide under the bed," she said, but both her and her brother, Abdul Rahman, were hit with shrapnel.
Abdul Rahman, 7, said very little about that day. "When they killed my father Walid, I hid in bed," he said.
Hiba Abdullah assumed the two children had died, but she said they were later found at a local hospital.
One Haditha victim was an elderly man, close to 80 years old, killed in his wheelchair as he appeared to be holding a Koran, according to the United States defense official, who described information collected during the investigation. An elderly woman was also killed, as were a mother and a child who were "in what appeared to be a prayer position," the official said.
Some victims had single gunshot wounds to the head, and at least one home where people were shot to death had no bullet marks on the walls, inconsistent with a clearing operation that would typically leave bullet holes, the official added.
Kerry going after swift boaters
The New York Times reminds us of a shameful moment from the Bush campaign against Kerry:
The attacks against Kerry were false and dishonored his military service. It was classic Rovian politics. (Check out the previous link and scroll down the page for a description of Rove's horrid attacks against an Alabama judge.) Determine an opponent's strengths and invent a lie to turn those strengths to weaknesses. The opponent will then have to waste valuable time and money answering the false charges. The opponent will be crippled and winded. Mission accomplished.
Three decades after the Vietnam War and nearly two years after Mr. Kerry's failed presidential bid, most Americans have probably forgotten why it ever mattered whether he went to Cambodia or that the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth accused him of making it all up, saying he was dishonest and lacked patriotism.
But among those who were on the front lines of the 2004 campaign, the battle over Mr. Kerry's wartime service continues, out of the limelight but in some ways more heatedly — because unlike then, Mr. Kerry has fully engaged in the fight. Only those on Mr. Kerry's side, however, have gathered new evidence to support their case...
Naval records and accounts from other sailors contradicted almost every claim they made, and some members of the group who had earlier praised Mr. Kerry's heroism contradicted themselves.
Still, the charges stuck. At a triumphant gathering of veterans in Fort Worth after the election, Mr. O'Neill was introduced as the man who "torpedoed" Mr. Kerry's campaign; the Swift boat group spent more than $130,000 for a "Mission Accomplished" celebration at Disney World. The president's brother, Gov. Jeb Bush of Florida, sent a letter thanking the "Swifties" for "their willingness to stand up to John Kerry." Even people within the Kerry campaign believed that the attacks had cost their candidate the presidency.
Some of Mr. Kerry's friends and former Swift boat crew members made advertisements during the race to try to shoot down the group's charges. But the campaign declined to air them widely because some strategists said that directly challenging the charges would legitimize them.
They approached Mr. Kerry after the election with the idea of setting the record straight.
So they have returned, for instance, to the question of Cambodia and whether Mr. Kerry was ever ordered to transport Navy Seals across the border, an experience that he said made him view government officials, who had declared that the country was not part of the war, as deceptive.
The Swift boat group insisted that no boats had gone to Cambodia. But Mr. Kerry's researcher, using Vietnam-era military maps and spot reports from the naval archives showing coordinates for his boat, traced his path from Ha Tien toward Cambodia on a mission that records say was to insert Navy Seals.
Mr. Kerry's supporters have also frozen frames from his amateur films of his time in Vietnam and have retrieved letters and military citations for other sailors to support his version of how he won the Silver Star — rebutting the Swift boat group's most explosive charge, that he shot an unarmed teenager who was fleeing his fire.
Another photograph provides evidence for Mr. Kerry's version of how he won the Bronze Star. And original reports pulled from the naval archives contradict the charge that he drafted his own accounts of various incidents — which left room, the Swift boat group had argued, to embellish them.
Mr. Kerry's defenders have received help from unlikely sources, including some who were originally aligned with the Swift boat group but later objected to its accusations against Mr. Kerry. One of them, Steve Hayes, was an early member of the group. A former sailor, he was a longtime friend and employee of William Franke, one of the group's founders, and he supported the push to have Mr. Kerry release his military files. But Mr. Hayes came to believe that the group was twisting Mr. Kerry's record.
"The mantra was just 'We want to set the record straight,' " Mr. Hayes said this month. "It became clear to me that it was morphing from an organization to set the record straight into a highly political vendetta. They knew it was not the truth."
Mr. Hayes broke with the group, ending a 35-year friendship with Mr. Franke, and voted for Mr. Kerry. He has provided a long interview to Mr. Kerry's supporters, backing their version of the incident for which Mr. Kerry received the Bronze Star.
The attacks against Kerry were false and dishonored his military service. It was classic Rovian politics. (Check out the previous link and scroll down the page for a description of Rove's horrid attacks against an Alabama judge.) Determine an opponent's strengths and invent a lie to turn those strengths to weaknesses. The opponent will then have to waste valuable time and money answering the false charges. The opponent will be crippled and winded. Mission accomplished.
"Shopgirl"
The filmed adaption of the Steve Martin novella is much like the story on which it is based: sad, funny, and perceptive. The story is a pitch perfect examination of Mirabelle Buttersfield, a young LA woman (Claire Danes) who has failed to successfully transition to adulthood. An artist who can't seem to get her life started, she works at the glove counter at Bloomingdales (Saks Fifth Avenue in the movie.) Ray Porter (Steve Martin), a tech millionaire, enters into her malaise, sweeps her off her feet, and helps jumpstart her life.
As Mirabelle matures, so does her similarly stalled friend Jeremy (Jason Schwartzmann.) The three meet in the story's final act and their stories are resolved in ways both sweet and bittersweet.
Where the book is the perfect length and concise, the movie drags as Mirabelle and Ray carry on their love affair. Still, both are highly recommended.
It's great to see Jason Schwartzmann ("Rushmore") continue to mature as an actor.
As Mirabelle matures, so does her similarly stalled friend Jeremy (Jason Schwartzmann.) The three meet in the story's final act and their stories are resolved in ways both sweet and bittersweet.
Where the book is the perfect length and concise, the movie drags as Mirabelle and Ray carry on their love affair. Still, both are highly recommended.
It's great to see Jason Schwartzmann ("Rushmore") continue to mature as an actor.
"Blade Runner" to be released again
How many director's cuts have been released of this film?
"X Men" biggest ever Memorial Day Weekend box office
I'm glad for its success. Perfect summer goobledy gook. Ten million times better than "Batman and Robin," or "Armageddon," two of the worst movies ever made.
The audience I saw it with loved it. Hope they give "X4" a bigger budget, though.
The audience I saw it with loved it. Hope they give "X4" a bigger budget, though.
Gore still like Hitler
And the Gore-bashing continues in full force. This time from meteorologist Bill Gray in the Washington Post magazine:
Ridiculous, but, once you get past the invoking of the Hitler metaphor, not necessarily untrue. Hitler hated Jewish people* and Al Gore "believed"** that global warming exists. Both sort of true. Gray invoking Hitler, though, is preposterous.
*Saying Hitler thought there was "something wrong" is a colossal understatement (maybe Gray is pro-Hitler!)
**Strange use of the past tense by Gray.
Gore believed in global warming almost as much as Hitler believed there was something wrong with the Jews.
Ridiculous, but, once you get past the invoking of the Hitler metaphor, not necessarily untrue. Hitler hated Jewish people* and Al Gore "believed"** that global warming exists. Both sort of true. Gray invoking Hitler, though, is preposterous.
*Saying Hitler thought there was "something wrong" is a colossal understatement (maybe Gray is pro-Hitler!)
**Strange use of the past tense by Gray.
Why the Republican Congress is losing, and will continue to lose, public respect
Word
Check out this statement from Rep. Barney Frank.
Let me be the one millionth person to jump on the bandwagon and get angry that Congress only causes an uproar about invasion of privacy and the separation of powers when it effects one of their own.
If you don't have anything to hide, you have nothing to worry about.
Let me be the one millionth person to jump on the bandwagon and get angry that Congress only causes an uproar about invasion of privacy and the separation of powers when it effects one of their own.
If you don't have anything to hide, you have nothing to worry about.
Bush and Blair still bedfellows
Why media reports about Iraq aren't more positive
See here.
On this Memorial Day, let's pray for a safe return of all our soldiers, military personnel, and media working in Iraq. Let's bring them home soon.
On this Memorial Day, let's pray for a safe return of all our soldiers, military personnel, and media working in Iraq. Let's bring them home soon.
Deconstructing statements about Hillary Clinton
A few days ago, I published a post about Hillary Clinton's prospects for winning the White House in 2008. In retrospect, I think my overall tone and a few of my statements were unfair, particularly "I believe she is more concerned with winning the White House than leading this country."
This isn't a fair assessment. While this is my impression, it is not well informed. I think the media tends to portray Mrs. Clinton this way, but she is no more calculating than many other politicians. I can't say that she is more concerned about winning the White House than leading. Given the lack of evidence, I would have to make the same statement about Bush, Kerry, McCain, etc. The evidence is nonexistent that Hillary is a Lady Macbeth figure as so often portrayed by the media, particularly the right wing outlets.
That being said, she does have some image problems to overcome which will hinder an effective nationwide campaign. And she is a figurehead of the opposition party which has not opposed with consistency or bravery. But so was Kerry, and I voted for him in 2004.
This isn't a fair assessment. While this is my impression, it is not well informed. I think the media tends to portray Mrs. Clinton this way, but she is no more calculating than many other politicians. I can't say that she is more concerned about winning the White House than leading. Given the lack of evidence, I would have to make the same statement about Bush, Kerry, McCain, etc. The evidence is nonexistent that Hillary is a Lady Macbeth figure as so often portrayed by the media, particularly the right wing outlets.
That being said, she does have some image problems to overcome which will hinder an effective nationwide campaign. And she is a figurehead of the opposition party which has not opposed with consistency or bravery. But so was Kerry, and I voted for him in 2004.
Friday, May 26, 2006
"X-Men:The Last Stand"
This morning, I donned my Incredible Hulk shirt preparing to geek out at the first showing of "X-Men" at the Esquire.
How was it?
Well, those who don't treat their Marvel Comics as sacred texts will probably get a kick out of it. It's got some really fun fight scenes and some cool effects. It is very much a B-movie. It is closer to "Fantastic Four" than "Spiderman 2" as far as quality goes. The setting for the climactic fight looks exactly like a stuido set and the deaths all feel pretty unnecessary. We do get to see the fastball special--twice!--and a Sentinel, sort of.
The geeks are gonna go see it and many of them will hate it. Those unfamiliar with the comics will find it a suitable diversion. I went to see it at 1:30 and the place was packed, so expect this one to open huge.
Recommended.
How was it?
Well, those who don't treat their Marvel Comics as sacred texts will probably get a kick out of it. It's got some really fun fight scenes and some cool effects. It is very much a B-movie. It is closer to "Fantastic Four" than "Spiderman 2" as far as quality goes. The setting for the climactic fight looks exactly like a stuido set and the deaths all feel pretty unnecessary. We do get to see the fastball special--twice!--and a Sentinel, sort of.
The geeks are gonna go see it and many of them will hate it. Those unfamiliar with the comics will find it a suitable diversion. I went to see it at 1:30 and the place was packed, so expect this one to open huge.
Recommended.
Amazing sight
I watched Joe Scarborough and David Gregory dissect Bush's response to his press conference question about regrets last night on MSNBC. David Gregory was measured in his response, but said that it was likely a calculated comment meant to boost sliding poll numbers. Scarborough was vicious and really laid into the president.
Times certainly have changed.
Times certainly have changed.
Emily Gilmore
My wife and I were watching the great fourth season of "Gilmore Girls" on DVD last night. Watching it, I was floored that Kelly Bishop had never been nominated for an Emmy. As the season progresses, Emily Gilmore (Kelly Bishop) becomes more alienated from her near-retirement age husband (Edward Herrmann) as he fully devotes himself to a new business venture.
In retaliation for her husband's neglect, she goes on a tour de force shopping spree, ordering around the sales clerks and eventually having a melt down in front of her daugher, granddaughter, and gawking shoppers. In the next episode, Emily finds out her always belittling and recently deceased mother-in-law once tried to convince her son to leave her at the altar. In the span of one episode she goes from poised to drunken haze to attentive spouse. She manages to be sympathetic, believable, and hilarious. It's a truly magnificent performance and worthy of some sort of accolade.
"Gilmore Girls" won one best makeup Emmy for the fourth season Episode "The Festival of Living Arts." Outside of this, the show has gotten little awards love. It has been nominated for numerous Teen Choice Awards, which is telling.
Because the show airs on the WB, it is perceived as typical teen fair. It is far better, more mature, challenging, and sophisticated then one-note Emmy fave "Will and Grace." Time to give some awards love for writing and acting. Start with Emily Bishop, then take a look at Lauren Graham, Liz Torres, and Sean Gunn.
In retaliation for her husband's neglect, she goes on a tour de force shopping spree, ordering around the sales clerks and eventually having a melt down in front of her daugher, granddaughter, and gawking shoppers. In the next episode, Emily finds out her always belittling and recently deceased mother-in-law once tried to convince her son to leave her at the altar. In the span of one episode she goes from poised to drunken haze to attentive spouse. She manages to be sympathetic, believable, and hilarious. It's a truly magnificent performance and worthy of some sort of accolade.
"Gilmore Girls" won one best makeup Emmy for the fourth season Episode "The Festival of Living Arts." Outside of this, the show has gotten little awards love. It has been nominated for numerous Teen Choice Awards, which is telling.
Because the show airs on the WB, it is perceived as typical teen fair. It is far better, more mature, challenging, and sophisticated then one-note Emmy fave "Will and Grace." Time to give some awards love for writing and acting. Start with Emily Bishop, then take a look at Lauren Graham, Liz Torres, and Sean Gunn.
Hillary in '08
God, I hope not.
She will lose if nominated, unless the press uncovers a heinous Bush misdeed--a la President Logan--causing the country turn from the GOP en masse.
Why?
She is a figurehead of the opposition party that has failed to oppose. Take her recent comments about the Iraq war. She still thinks she was right to vote for the war, but not for the handling of the war. As Matthew Yglesias points out at the above link, in voting for the war, she was endorsing the team who would launch the war. She's having buyer's remorse. This is hardly a very brave, principled, or inspiring stand as the Iraq conflict drags on. It's sort of an "Oops!" The kind of oops that should get you fired.
Secondly, the war should never have been voted for in the first place. With all the evidence in hand--much of which was readily available prior to launching this ridiculous conflict--how can she say she would still vote for the war? She helped give this war liberal cred, and I can't forgive her for this.
The Democrats, for the most part, aren't playing to win. They are playing not to lose which will ensure small gains in Congress, but I think will lose them the White House. A majority of Americans disapprove of the president at the moment, but they will be more likely to vote for a John McCain or Chris Shays who are just enough to the left of Bush to win.
Plus, Hillary will never play in the South and the Midwest. There's still too much Clinton hatred--particulalry toward Hillary--for her to overcome.
What else? Where her husband was charismatic, she comes off as cold and calculating. People do not trust her. I know I don't. I think she's too much of a middle of the road Democrat who has failed to oppose the president out of fear. I believe she is more concerned with winning the White House than leading this country.
She will lose if nominated, unless the press uncovers a heinous Bush misdeed--a la President Logan--causing the country turn from the GOP en masse.
Why?
She is a figurehead of the opposition party that has failed to oppose. Take her recent comments about the Iraq war. She still thinks she was right to vote for the war, but not for the handling of the war. As Matthew Yglesias points out at the above link, in voting for the war, she was endorsing the team who would launch the war. She's having buyer's remorse. This is hardly a very brave, principled, or inspiring stand as the Iraq conflict drags on. It's sort of an "Oops!" The kind of oops that should get you fired.
Secondly, the war should never have been voted for in the first place. With all the evidence in hand--much of which was readily available prior to launching this ridiculous conflict--how can she say she would still vote for the war? She helped give this war liberal cred, and I can't forgive her for this.
The Democrats, for the most part, aren't playing to win. They are playing not to lose which will ensure small gains in Congress, but I think will lose them the White House. A majority of Americans disapprove of the president at the moment, but they will be more likely to vote for a John McCain or Chris Shays who are just enough to the left of Bush to win.
Plus, Hillary will never play in the South and the Midwest. There's still too much Clinton hatred--particulalry toward Hillary--for her to overcome.
What else? Where her husband was charismatic, she comes off as cold and calculating. People do not trust her. I know I don't. I think she's too much of a middle of the road Democrat who has failed to oppose the president out of fear. I believe she is more concerned with winning the White House than leading this country.
Thursday, May 25, 2006
"The DaVinci Code"
While watching CNN this weekend, there was a lengthy segment, including a panel discussion, on how "The DaVinci Code" was getting bad reviews. Why is this news? Hello, pay for play.
Finally saw the movie today with a former seminary classmate of mine. He says whenever he tells people he is pursuing a doctorate in divinity they inevitably ask about "DaVinci. He thought it was about time to familiarize himself with the story.
The movie is very long and deserving of a vicious spoofing. It's an exposition heavy, ponderous, goofy display. The characters are place holders. It is Tom Hanks worst movie. Don't get me wrong, he's a good actor, but his heart's clearly not in this movie. It would be Ron Howard's worst if he hadn't made the atrocity "The Grinch Who Stole Christmas."
Don't waste your time.
Finally saw the movie today with a former seminary classmate of mine. He says whenever he tells people he is pursuing a doctorate in divinity they inevitably ask about "DaVinci. He thought it was about time to familiarize himself with the story.
The movie is very long and deserving of a vicious spoofing. It's an exposition heavy, ponderous, goofy display. The characters are place holders. It is Tom Hanks worst movie. Don't get me wrong, he's a good actor, but his heart's clearly not in this movie. It would be Ron Howard's worst if he hadn't made the atrocity "The Grinch Who Stole Christmas."
Don't waste your time.
Penguin video
"Lost" 5/24
Incredible. So we know for certain our castaways are not in purgatory/some place outside of our world.
"Four-toed statue." What's going on there?
Check this out.
Is that Jack in flashback? No this is one of the two workers in the Arctic research station. "Bad Twin" Jack possibly.
What do Jack, Kate, and Sayid have planned?
Loved the Desmond flashback and the Charles Dickens props. Nothing beats a great Dickens novel. Dickens work is full of huge, colorful characters who--we usually learn by novel's end--are all connected to one another whether through blood, mutual friends, or enemies. Sounds like "Lost" to me.
Thank you Lindelof, Cuse, Abrams, et al. for the best fantasy/sci-fi serialized storytelling outside of Bill Willingham's "Fables." Looking forward to October.
"Four-toed statue." What's going on there?
Check this out.
Is that Jack in flashback? No this is one of the two workers in the Arctic research station. "Bad Twin" Jack possibly.
What do Jack, Kate, and Sayid have planned?
Loved the Desmond flashback and the Charles Dickens props. Nothing beats a great Dickens novel. Dickens work is full of huge, colorful characters who--we usually learn by novel's end--are all connected to one another whether through blood, mutual friends, or enemies. Sounds like "Lost" to me.
Thank you Lindelof, Cuse, Abrams, et al. for the best fantasy/sci-fi serialized storytelling outside of Bill Willingham's "Fables." Looking forward to October.
Explanation and apology
The first photo from the Katrina post below was taken on Aug. 30, 2005. On this day, New Orleans was flooding and the city's troubles were increasing exponentially. At the time, Bush was caught in the middle of this goofy photo-op. The photo has become blogosphere shorthand for pointing out Bush's poor handling of the post-Katrina response. Why is this photo-op an example of carelessness/callousness? Email me if you really don't understand or disagree.
I have been told that the penguin video link is still not working. Saint Louis Bread Company--where I am now--blocks me from visiting YouTube. (Guess they're afraid of ribaldry.) As soon as I get to another wireless location, I will try to remedy the problem. Sorry about the delays.
I have been told that the penguin video link is still not working. Saint Louis Bread Company--where I am now--blocks me from visiting YouTube. (Guess they're afraid of ribaldry.) As soon as I get to another wireless location, I will try to remedy the problem. Sorry about the delays.
Enron chief executives found guilty
This just in:
Nice to see lying is still frowned upon. Too bad they didn't lie for the sake of national security. Then it would have been okay.
For a company that once seemed so complex that almost no one could understand its arcane accounting or how it actually made its money, the cases ended up being nearly as simple as could be. Mr. Lay and Mr. Skilling were found guilty of lying — lying to investors, to employees and to government regulators — in an effort to disguise the crumbling fortunes of their energy empire.
Nice to see lying is still frowned upon. Too bad they didn't lie for the sake of national security. Then it would have been okay.
Wednesday, May 24, 2006
Hurley: The Perfume for Men
The star of "Lost" gets his own scent.
Overheard in the Saint Louis Bread Company
While in the Saint Louis Bread Company in The Loop, I sat near a large group of fifty and sixtyish folks who regularly meet for coffee. Among their group is a very loud mouthed liberal who was a know-it-all and general all around ass.
Having spent a good deal of time around liberals, particulary while involved in protesting the Iraq war, I have found that many of the city's more vocal older liberals are loud, obnoxious, and rude. I hope I don't turn into that. YECK!
Having spent a good deal of time around liberals, particulary while involved in protesting the Iraq war, I have found that many of the city's more vocal older liberals are loud, obnoxious, and rude. I hope I don't turn into that. YECK!
"American Idol" 5/23/06
Finally watched "American Idol" last night. Been avoiding watching a whole episode because I find the music pretty horrible. I read in Slate yesterday that "American Idol" had gotten good and was good for music. Plus, I found out finalist Taylor Hicks is from Alabama, my home state.
Well, the music was not very good--too bland for my taste--but Taylor Hicks can sing. When he performed Elton John's "Levon"--the night's best song--he sounded very reminiscent of the Black Crowe's Chris Robinson.
Katherine McPhee was so-so. Her performances were the epitome of the middle-of-the-road easy listening ballads that make up the lion's share of Idol performances.
I even tried to vote. (Taylor, of course.) However, the three available lines were consistently busy. How far I've fallen.
Well, the music was not very good--too bland for my taste--but Taylor Hicks can sing. When he performed Elton John's "Levon"--the night's best song--he sounded very reminiscent of the Black Crowe's Chris Robinson.
Katherine McPhee was so-so. Her performances were the epitome of the middle-of-the-road easy listening ballads that make up the lion's share of Idol performances.
I even tried to vote. (Taylor, of course.) However, the three available lines were consistently busy. How far I've fallen.
Hayden nomination proceeds with ease
And the Democrats--again--fail to serve as a proper opposition party. Glenn Greenwald laments their cowardice:
As mad as I am at Bush, the Democrats have stood by and, for the most part, aided Bush in his destruction of democracy. Disgraceful.
For all the talk of the weakened and impotent presidency and the split among Republicans, it is still virtually always the case that the President gets what he wants, and does so without much difficulty. The few times he fails to -- Harriet Miers, the Dubai Port deal, anti-torture legislation -- is because Republicans, not Democrats, take a stand against the White House.
But by and large, what happened yesterday with Gen. Hayden's nomination is exactly what would have happened in 2002 and 2003. Democrats are afraid to challenge the President due to their fear -- always due to their fear -- that they will be depicted as mean, obstructionist and weak on national security. And so, even with an unbelievable weakened President, and even with regard to the most consequential issues -- and can one doubt that installing Gen. Hayden as CIA Director is consequential? -- Democrats back away from fights, take no clear position, divide against each other, and stand up for exactly nothing.
As mad as I am at Bush, the Democrats have stood by and, for the most part, aided Bush in his destruction of democracy. Disgraceful.
The dastardly press
According to Jonah Goldberg at National Review Online it was the press who was the villain of the Katrina aftermath. Our president was its victim.
Shame on you press! Apparently, the Katrina aftermath wasn't that bad for minorities either, says Goldberg.
Shame on you press! Apparently, the Katrina aftermath wasn't that bad for minorities either, says Goldberg.
Tuesday, May 23, 2006
Circa 2005
I'm "Google"-able
Nothing to see here
No Justice Department investigation of NSA eavesdropping:
So let's get this straight. The Justice Department can't investigate the possibility of NSA wrongdoing because the NSA won't let them.
Satire is unnecessary in this day and age. (This is why all John Stewart has to do is read the headlines and raise an eyebrow. Boom! You've got a comedy show. The material writes itself.)
UPDATE: I think the writing staff of "The Daily Show" is talented and does some great material. But sometimes the show's biggest laughs come after a headline is read sans joke.
The government has abruptly ended an inquiry into the warrantless eavesdropping program because the National Security Agency refused to grant Justice Department lawyers the necessary security clearance to probe the matter.
So let's get this straight. The Justice Department can't investigate the possibility of NSA wrongdoing because the NSA won't let them.
Satire is unnecessary in this day and age. (This is why all John Stewart has to do is read the headlines and raise an eyebrow. Boom! You've got a comedy show. The material writes itself.)
UPDATE: I think the writing staff of "The Daily Show" is talented and does some great material. But sometimes the show's biggest laughs come after a headline is read sans joke.
Purveyor of penguin propaganda? Perhaps.
YouTube is passing along pernicious penguin propaganda.
Seriously, though, go check out this video my brother produced for Sea World. It's very funny.
Update: I fixed the above link. I had the wrong link in my cut and past queue. Go check out the video.
Seriously, though, go check out this video my brother produced for Sea World. It's very funny.
Update: I fixed the above link. I had the wrong link in my cut and past queue. Go check out the video.
Is Fox News a purveyor of propaganda?
I report. You decide.
Here and here.
Gore and Goebbels? Well they do both start with G.
Al Gore's movie must be very effective if they're already gearing up the slime machine.
Here and here.
Gore and Goebbels? Well they do both start with G.
Al Gore's movie must be very effective if they're already gearing up the slime machine.
Maybe we're gearing up for war in S. America
Gearing up for Iran
This weekend I read some commentary on National Review's blog "The Corner" which made faux-heroic statements about how the time to confront Iran was now.
If not us, who?
If not now, when?
It's like they live in some-sort of parallel universe in which the powers that be didn't lie to the American people about the threat of another middle eastern nation. They also seem to have forgotten how well our current middle eastern campaigns are going.
The most repeated evidence against Iran is that their leader wants to wipe Israel off the face of the earth.
With what?
How is this a serious threat if Iran doesn't have the means? Desire does not equal ability. We have been told, as evidence concerning Iraq's WMD crumbles, that Saddam desired to have a viable nuclear weapon's program. Therefore, attacking Iraq was warranted. This is a fallacy.
Hopefully, the American people won't be fooled again.
If not us, who?
If not now, when?
It's like they live in some-sort of parallel universe in which the powers that be didn't lie to the American people about the threat of another middle eastern nation. They also seem to have forgotten how well our current middle eastern campaigns are going.
The most repeated evidence against Iran is that their leader wants to wipe Israel off the face of the earth.
With what?
How is this a serious threat if Iran doesn't have the means? Desire does not equal ability. We have been told, as evidence concerning Iraq's WMD crumbles, that Saddam desired to have a viable nuclear weapon's program. Therefore, attacking Iraq was warranted. This is a fallacy.
Hopefully, the American people won't be fooled again.
"24" Season finale
Another May sweeps period, another "24" finale.
Last night's giant-sized annual was okay. The petty officer's vicious stabbing of the terrorist was harrowing and one of the most violent moments to ever air on network television in the 7 o'clock hour. Pretty shocked that such a scene does not cause the same kind of uproar as Janet Jackson's booby show. Ain't that America.
The finale all had a certain inevitability. We knew the president would be foiled and we knew the terrorists would be stopped. Only so-so thrills.
Off to China...
Last night's giant-sized annual was okay. The petty officer's vicious stabbing of the terrorist was harrowing and one of the most violent moments to ever air on network television in the 7 o'clock hour. Pretty shocked that such a scene does not cause the same kind of uproar as Janet Jackson's booby show. Ain't that America.
The finale all had a certain inevitability. We knew the president would be foiled and we knew the terrorists would be stopped. Only so-so thrills.
Off to China...
Overheard at St. Louis Bread Company
"I'm doing well. Glad to be out of jail."
The all powerful executive
The idea of the all powerful executive free from scrutiny or oversight was of course intended by our founding fathers. The job of congress is to advise and... Well, the job of congress is to advise. The executive has free reign to do what it wants when it wants. Go back and read Article II of the US Constitution. It's all in there, or so I've been assured.
The no holds barred executive marches onward:
We captured and facilitated the torturing of the wrong man. A)We captured the wrong guy and B)we facilitated his torture. Who is not afraid and horrified right now? Is this the country you proudly call your own. I love America, but this is horrifying. And now, he can't seek compensation because doing so would reveal state secrets.
There's more:
The executive is out of control and we should all be horrified. This is not the America any of us should want.
The no holds barred executive marches onward:
Last Thursday, a federal court in Virginia threw out a lawsuit against the government that had been brought by a German citizen named Khalid el-Masri. El-Masri alleged that the government had violated U.S. law when—as part if its "extraordinary rendition" program—it authorized his abduction, drugging, confinement, and torture. His captors allegedly shuttled him on clandestine flights to and from places like Kabul, Baghdad, and Skopje, Macedonia, during the five months of his detention. He was released only when the government realized it had kidnapped the wrong man. El-Masri has substantial evidence to back up his story, and German prosecutors have verified much of it. And, while the government has not confirmed that it took el-Masri as part of its extraordinary rendition program, it has not shied away from admitting the program exists; it has in fact trumpeted it as an effective tool in the "war on terror." So why then was el-Masri's lawsuit thrown out? Because the judge accepted the government's claim that any alleged activities relating to el-Masri were "state secrets."...
We captured and facilitated the torturing of the wrong man. A)We captured the wrong guy and B)we facilitated his torture. Who is not afraid and horrified right now? Is this the country you proudly call your own. I love America, but this is horrifying. And now, he can't seek compensation because doing so would reveal state secrets.
There's more:
...Despite the burgeoning use of this privilege and the way it's been used to gut entire cases, the most disturbing aspect of the Bush administration's expansion of the state secrets privilege may well be this: More and more, it is invoked not in response to run-of-the-mill government negligence cases but in response to allegations of criminal conduct on the part of the government. These are not slip-and-fall cases. They are challenges to the administration's broad new theories of unchecked executive power. By using the state secrets privilege to shut down whole lawsuits that would examine government actions before the cases even get under way, the administration avoids having to give a legal account of its behavior. And if this tactic persists—if the administration continues to broadly assert this privilege and courts continue to accept it—the administration will have succeeded in creating an insurmountable immunity that can be invoked against pretty much any legal claim that the "war on terror" violates the law. The standard and winning response to any plaintiff who asserted such charges would be, quite simply, that it's a secret.
The Bush administration has fought at every turn to limit scrutiny of its conduct since Sept. 11. And, unless courts start to reject its assertion, the administration may have found in the state secrets privilege the ultimate tool for making its actions invisible.
The executive is out of control and we should all be horrified. This is not the America any of us should want.
Monday, May 22, 2006
Condoleeza, Condoleeza, please give me a reezon. Holla.
Condoleeza Rice on the Meet the Press this weekend reminded us of the reason we went to Iraq:
We went to Iraq to overthrow a destabilizing force in the Middle East and create a democracy.
What about Iraq's ties to al-Qaeda?
What about Saddam's nuclear program? We didn't want "the smoking gun to be a mushroom cloud."
Would millions of Americans have agreed to war if the real reasons for going to war had been stated: we wanted to invade Iraq to possibly establish a working democracy.
Infuriating.
I understand that Americans see on their screens violence. They continue to see Americans killed, and we mourn every death. These are very hard things to do. But I would ask that people remember why we are there. We are there because we are trying to--having overthrown a brutal dictator who was a destabilizing force in the Middle East, we're trying to help the Iraqis create a stable foundation for democracy and a stable foundation for peace."
We went to Iraq to overthrow a destabilizing force in the Middle East and create a democracy.
What about Iraq's ties to al-Qaeda?
What about Saddam's nuclear program? We didn't want "the smoking gun to be a mushroom cloud."
Would millions of Americans have agreed to war if the real reasons for going to war had been stated: we wanted to invade Iraq to possibly establish a working democracy.
Infuriating.
1 in 136 Americans are in jail
According to a new AP report, 1 in 136 Americans are currently incarcerated.
As pointed out by SusanG at Daily Kos, the report also states that "62 percent of people in jails have not been convicted, meaning many of them are awaiting trial."
62% of the 2.2 million people incarcerated have not been convicted of a crime. The system is definitely broken.
As pointed out by SusanG at Daily Kos, the report also states that "62 percent of people in jails have not been convicted, meaning many of them are awaiting trial."
62% of the 2.2 million people incarcerated have not been convicted of a crime. The system is definitely broken.
SNL cartoon enlightens
If you didn't catch the season finale of "Saturday Night Live," here is a link to one of the highlights of the show.
The cartoon is not hilarious, but it is a great catalog of the startling dishonesties regulary spoken by our Commander-in-Chief. The punchline is dead on.
The cartoon is not hilarious, but it is a great catalog of the startling dishonesties regulary spoken by our Commander-in-Chief. The punchline is dead on.
Torture Awareness Month
I was contacted by a group trying to raise awareness of Torture Awareness Month. They asked that I pass along a link to their site given this site's frequent postings concerning the issue.
Saturday, May 20, 2006
"Art School Confidential"
I am a big fan of Daniel Clowes work and was very excited to see one of his best short pieces was being turned into a movie.
The movie is strange and a little disjointed, but I think Clowes fans will be satisfied. Its a dark movie that takes "underdog becomes the hero" movie conventions and subverts them. I didn't really see the end of the movie coming, but given Clowes work, it was a perfect conclusion.
Many critics have commented on the fact that the movie's murder subplot feels shoehorned in. It is absolutely essential to the story, though, asit provides the film's protagonist with his triumphant entry into the art world.
"Art School Confidential" fails in some ways, but it is wholly original and unlike anything you will see in the theater this year.
Recommended.
The movie is strange and a little disjointed, but I think Clowes fans will be satisfied. Its a dark movie that takes "underdog becomes the hero" movie conventions and subverts them. I didn't really see the end of the movie coming, but given Clowes work, it was a perfect conclusion.
Many critics have commented on the fact that the movie's murder subplot feels shoehorned in. It is absolutely essential to the story, though, as
"Art School Confidential" fails in some ways, but it is wholly original and unlike anything you will see in the theater this year.
Recommended.
Four suicide attempts
Yesterday, I told you about four suicide attempts at our illegal Guantanamo interment camp. According to NPR at least one of these suicide attmepts was faked and was a way to get the guards into range to be attacked.
Friday, May 19, 2006
"Giant"
My wife and I watched this George Stevens epic melodrama last night.
What a crazy movie. The first two hours are a somewhat striaghtforward story about old Texas represented by cattle rancher Rock Hudson versus new Texas represented by upstart oil millionaire James Dean. Then as the movie enters its third hour, it becomes an examination of racism and the corrupting power of wealth.
We are treated to an Old Testament style bacchanal as a bevy of unruly bigoted new oil millionaires are chased by God in the form of a vicious storm to a large dining room to await their judgement. A drunken James Dean appears to be acting in a different movie as he embraces method acting, mumbling his lines and stumbling around, while his costars use old school melodrama styles straight out of Douglas Sirk. (He reminds you so much of Marlon Brando in this movie that you wonder if he would have gotten obese and crazy in his old age, too.) The movie's climax finds an old Rock Hudson overcoming his racism by engaging in a fist fight with a bigoted diner owner. The fist fight is intense, with some bracing first person shots. It is unexpected and compelling.
Catch this movie if you can and enjoy its weird progression.
What a crazy movie. The first two hours are a somewhat striaghtforward story about old Texas represented by cattle rancher Rock Hudson versus new Texas represented by upstart oil millionaire James Dean. Then as the movie enters its third hour, it becomes an examination of racism and the corrupting power of wealth.
We are treated to an Old Testament style bacchanal as a bevy of unruly bigoted new oil millionaires are chased by God in the form of a vicious storm to a large dining room to await their judgement. A drunken James Dean appears to be acting in a different movie as he embraces method acting, mumbling his lines and stumbling around, while his costars use old school melodrama styles straight out of Douglas Sirk. (He reminds you so much of Marlon Brando in this movie that you wonder if he would have gotten obese and crazy in his old age, too.) The movie's climax finds an old Rock Hudson overcoming his racism by engaging in a fist fight with a bigoted diner owner. The fist fight is intense, with some bracing first person shots. It is unexpected and compelling.
Catch this movie if you can and enjoy its weird progression.
Animals have a firm grasp of irony
If there is one thing I have learned from the recent slate of CGI animal fests, it is that today's animals have a firm grasp of irony. Woodland creatures have a droll sense of humor and are quick with witticisms.
Ads for "Over the Hedge" remind me why I prefer Pixar films so much more than CGI offerings of Dreamworks. Pixar films are about real fears and overcoming them. They address the real concerns of children, have great action scenes, and create character and story-centric humor. They are masterpieces. Children and adults love them for the same reason--their excellence.
"Shrek" and its ilk are more concerned with poking fun at pop culture and embracing irony. They usually end with a rousing chorus of bubble gum pop to erase from our minds the hour and a half of cynicism we have just witnessed.
Whose films do you think will have a longer shelf life?
Ads for "Over the Hedge" remind me why I prefer Pixar films so much more than CGI offerings of Dreamworks. Pixar films are about real fears and overcoming them. They address the real concerns of children, have great action scenes, and create character and story-centric humor. They are masterpieces. Children and adults love them for the same reason--their excellence.
"Shrek" and its ilk are more concerned with poking fun at pop culture and embracing irony. They usually end with a rousing chorus of bubble gum pop to erase from our minds the hour and a half of cynicism we have just witnessed.
Whose films do you think will have a longer shelf life?
9-11 Myths
While catching the recent taping of the "Al Franken Show" here in St. Louis, some guy came up and handed me a xeroxed flyer exposing 9-11 "myths." It was loosey-goosey and hardly compelling. He told me because I was a smart guy, I probably new all this already. What did he want, a tip?
Some Americans, missing the "X-Files" no doubt, want to attribute the horrors of 9-11 to a big conspiracy by God knows who. Their evidence is cobbled together and all over the place. Their presentations read like "Lost" discussion boards. I heard one man claiming that all Jewish people who worked in the Twin Towers were told to stay home on September the 11th. Because Jewish people hate New York and all, I guess.
I am not convinced and am offended by their callousness. In case you missed it, Populuar Mechanics ran an investigative piece debunking many of the 9-11 myths. Especially check out the part debunking the claim that airline fuel can't melt steel so therefore explosives must have been placed in the tower.
Some Americans, missing the "X-Files" no doubt, want to attribute the horrors of 9-11 to a big conspiracy by God knows who. Their evidence is cobbled together and all over the place. Their presentations read like "Lost" discussion boards. I heard one man claiming that all Jewish people who worked in the Twin Towers were told to stay home on September the 11th. Because Jewish people hate New York and all, I guess.
I am not convinced and am offended by their callousness. In case you missed it, Populuar Mechanics ran an investigative piece debunking many of the 9-11 myths. Especially check out the part debunking the claim that airline fuel can't melt steel so therefore explosives must have been placed in the tower.
All legal means
As questioning of the White House continues concerning violations of civil liberties and torture and detainment of prisoners, we are continually assured that everything being done is legal.
Is it?
If you accept the White House interpretation of Article II of the US Constitution that the President can use all "necessary means" to protect the US. This justification is a blank check that gives the president the ability to wage this war in any way he sees fit.
Therefore, torture, wiretapping, detaining prisoners indefinitely, etc. could all be construed as legal.
Don't get fooled. This is what the White House means by the fact that all their actions are legal.
Is it?
If you accept the White House interpretation of Article II of the US Constitution that the President can use all "necessary means" to protect the US. This justification is a blank check that gives the president the ability to wage this war in any way he sees fit.
Therefore, torture, wiretapping, detaining prisoners indefinitely, etc. could all be construed as legal.
Don't get fooled. This is what the White House means by the fact that all their actions are legal.
Guantanamo prison must be closed, part 3
From the story posted below:
Military tribunals? These might be acceptable if someone could define the scope of this war and could name our enemy? Islamofascism? Terror? Try again.
There is evidence that the many of the men at Guantanamo weren't even captured on the battlefield.
Therefore, Bellinger's statement that the burden for finding a solution to Guantanamo lies with the critics is ridiculous. Critics did not create this mess. The prisoners should never have been collected as they were and held indefinitely. They should be returned home.
The White House noted Friday that President Bush said earlier this month he would like to close the Guantanamo detention center, but he was waiting for a U.S. Supreme Court ruling on whether inmates can face military tribunals...
State Department legal adviser John B. Bellinger III, who led the U.S. delegation at the U.N. panel hearing...added that the United States was working "very hard" to address concerns about Guantanamo, but that critics had failed to come up with suggestions on what to do with the detainees.
Military tribunals? These might be acceptable if someone could define the scope of this war and could name our enemy? Islamofascism? Terror? Try again.
There is evidence that the many of the men at Guantanamo weren't even captured on the battlefield.
Therefore, Bellinger's statement that the burden for finding a solution to Guantanamo lies with the critics is ridiculous. Critics did not create this mess. The prisoners should never have been collected as they were and held indefinitely. They should be returned home.
Guantanamo prison must be closed, part 2
From the AP:
Why is the UN worried? The US already prosecuted the uber mastermind behind all unjust treatment of US war on terror detainees.
The United States should close its prison at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, and avoid using secret detention facilities in the war on terror, the U.N. panel that monitors compliance with the world's anti-torture treaty said Friday.
The Committee Against Torture also said detainees should not be returned to any country where they could face a "real risk" of being tortured.
The criticism, contained in an 11-page report, followed a hearing in Geneva this month on U.S. adherence to the 1984 U.N. Convention Against Torture. The criticism carries no penalties beyond international scrutiny, but human rights observers say it could influence U.S. public opinion and hence the government.
Why is the UN worried? The US already prosecuted the uber mastermind behind all unjust treatment of US war on terror detainees.
Guantanamo prison must be closed, part 1
From the AP:
"Fourth attempted suicide that day..."
Are you kidding me? Why does this prison still exist and what the hell is going on there?
Prisoners wielding improvised weapons clashed with guards trying to stop a detainee from committing suicide at the U.S. prison in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, the military said Friday.
The fight occurred Thursday in a medium-security section of the camp as guards were responding to the fourth attempted suicide that day at the detention center on the U.S. Navy base, said Cmdr. Robert Durand.
"Fourth attempted suicide that day..."
Are you kidding me? Why does this prison still exist and what the hell is going on there?
"You have no liberties if you are dead."
Thanks Pat Roberts (R-Kan) for that asinine bon mot.
Were you also aware that the constitution was not a suicide pact?
Nothing better than rule by bromide.
Were you also aware that the constitution was not a suicide pact?
Nothing better than rule by bromide.
Thursday, May 18, 2006
Critics of Snow are not cultured
Tony Snow used the term "tar baby" in a press conference recently. Was asked about it on Hugh Hewitt's radio show and responded thusly:
Tony, Tony, Tony. Most of your critics realized that it was both a)from a Joel Chandler Harris story, and b)that it was still a bad idea to use the term in a press conference. It's a loaded term and one to be avoided by the President's press secretary.
Why was "Song of the South" hidden in the Disney vault for ages? Why aren't Joel Chandler Harris stories widely read by American schoolchildren? Because these stories are widely seen as offensive because of their employment of racist stereotypes. Minstrelsy for children, if you will. That is why using the term "tar baby" is a bad idea and makes you a lightning rod for criticism.
I don't want to make a big deal out of the incident, but it was the not the critics of Snow who were displaying ignorance.
Well, apparently, what’s happened is, apparently some people are unfamiliar with the pathways of American culture, and don’t realize the old Uncle Remus story where somebody hugs a tar baby. …
I’ve decided, though, because it’s a classic case of, I think, somebody trying to sort of pick a fight. I’ll probably take that out of my toolchest of rhetorical devices, rather than having to explain a hundred and fifty years of American culture.
Tony, Tony, Tony. Most of your critics realized that it was both a)from a Joel Chandler Harris story, and b)that it was still a bad idea to use the term in a press conference. It's a loaded term and one to be avoided by the President's press secretary.
Why was "Song of the South" hidden in the Disney vault for ages? Why aren't Joel Chandler Harris stories widely read by American schoolchildren? Because these stories are widely seen as offensive because of their employment of racist stereotypes. Minstrelsy for children, if you will. That is why using the term "tar baby" is a bad idea and makes you a lightning rod for criticism.
I don't want to make a big deal out of the incident, but it was the not the critics of Snow who were displaying ignorance.
"Come back zinc!"
Progressives hate carbon dioxide and they don't want you to have any, according to these ads created by industry to counteract media buzz/greenhouse effect fears surrounding the release of "An Inconvenient Truth."
You see we need CO2. You breath it out. Plants take it in. It makes you happy. It makes your children happy. It makes dandelions happy. And now, some people want to take it away from you.
Special no-prize to anyone who can give me the origin of this post's title.
You see we need CO2. You breath it out. Plants take it in. It makes you happy. It makes your children happy. It makes dandelions happy. And now, some people want to take it away from you.
Special no-prize to anyone who can give me the origin of this post's title.
This is weird
According to Sensenbrenner (R-Wis), Bush asked for the inclusion of some of the more stringent measures in the recent immigration legislation.
There's some bad--bad as in incompetent--politics at work here. Bush, in what I perceive--if Sensenbrenner is telling the truth--in an attempt to create another wedge issue, decides to get tough on illegal immigration. But his numbers continue to drop precipitously, immigrants turn out in en masse to protest get tough measures, and the get tough idea was likely not tracking well in internal polling.
So he goes on the air and presents a softer plan that angers many of his base. Some of the more rabid base--bloggers--have been pushing impeachment.
This whole thing is a giant mess for the president.
"He basically turned his back on provisions of the House-passed bill, a lot of which we were requested to put in the bill by the White House," Sensenbrenner, R-Wis., angrily told reporters in a conference call. "That was last fall when we were drafting the bill, and now the president appears not to be interested in it at all."
There's some bad--bad as in incompetent--politics at work here. Bush, in what I perceive--if Sensenbrenner is telling the truth--in an attempt to create another wedge issue, decides to get tough on illegal immigration. But his numbers continue to drop precipitously, immigrants turn out in en masse to protest get tough measures, and the get tough idea was likely not tracking well in internal polling.
So he goes on the air and presents a softer plan that angers many of his base. Some of the more rabid base--bloggers--have been pushing impeachment.
This whole thing is a giant mess for the president.
Values voters
George Will makes the sensible observation that everyone is a values voter--not just conservatives who oppose gay marriage and abortion.
Who doesn't attempt to vote their values, except maybe for the insane?
Who doesn't attempt to vote their values, except maybe for the insane?
"Fast Food Nation" trailer is up
"Lost" 5/17
Awesome episode. This show so has me right in the palm of its hand. Will next week be totally insane? Are Lindelof and Cuse gonna blow our minds? I hope so.
Speculation on next week's episode:
"The Others" are descendants of, or are, our heroes(?) themselves. This would require some time travel.
Walt is not benevolent. He is "him."
They either never got on Flight 815, or that flight never crashed. They were placed on the island by the Hanso Foundation/"others"/or someone else. (Of course, this is hard to substantiate when you think about all the crash related deaths, like the guy sucked into the engine, or Kate's escort.)
One of our heroes is evil. Jack maybe. He sure seemed eager to follow Walt's less than sane plan, and we have been clued in to his possibly dark past. (Remember the tatoo?) Charlie, maybe. Definitely a little off of late. And he just lost his church project partner.
I think one of the big reveals in the finale will definitely be that another of our heroes is bad or is going insane. Angelus revisited.
Speculation on next week's episode:
"The Others" are descendants of, or are, our heroes(?) themselves. This would require some time travel.
Walt is not benevolent. He is "him."
They either never got on Flight 815, or that flight never crashed. They were placed on the island by the Hanso Foundation/"others"/or someone else. (Of course, this is hard to substantiate when you think about all the crash related deaths, like the guy sucked into the engine, or Kate's escort.)
One of our heroes is evil. Jack maybe. He sure seemed eager to follow Walt's less than sane plan, and we have been clued in to his possibly dark past. (Remember the tatoo?) Charlie, maybe. Definitely a little off of late. And he just lost his church project partner.
I think one of the big reveals in the finale will definitely be that another of our heroes is bad or is going insane. Angelus revisited.
Horrible news
News from Iraq:
Congressman John Murtha blew the whistle on this story and some on the right are calling for a lynching.
Why would Murtha, a former Marine and friend to the military, break this story? Maybe so it isn't buried, according to Billmon. Someone high up in the military wanted to make sure this story wasn't "lost" and Murtha was the vehicle.
Is this instance another reminder that we must leave Iraq soon? Is this merely a horrible incident that does nothing to detract from our mission?
Can someone remind me again, succinctly, why we are in Iraq anyway?
A Pentagon probe into the death of Iraqi civilians last November in the Iraqi city of Haditha will show that U.S. Marines "killed innocent civilians in cold blood," a U.S. lawmaker said Wednesday.
From the beginning, Iraqis in the town of Haditha said U.S. Marines deliberately killed 15 unarmed Iraqi civilians, including seven women and three children.
One young Iraqi girl said the Marines killed six members of her family, including her parents. “The Americans came into the room where my father was praying,” she said, “and shot him.”
Congressman John Murtha blew the whistle on this story and some on the right are calling for a lynching.
Why would Murtha, a former Marine and friend to the military, break this story? Maybe so it isn't buried, according to Billmon. Someone high up in the military wanted to make sure this story wasn't "lost" and Murtha was the vehicle.
Is this instance another reminder that we must leave Iraq soon? Is this merely a horrible incident that does nothing to detract from our mission?
Can someone remind me again, succinctly, why we are in Iraq anyway?
Wednesday, May 17, 2006
Neil Cavuto
From this weekend, the Fox News personality had this to say on government collection of phone records:
"Would we rather have them collecting our records or our remains?"
"Would we rather have them collecting our records or our remains?"
"Dateline: Internet Predators"
Saw an ad for this show the other night while taking a rare peek at "The Apprentice." (By the way, watching that show made me physically ill with tension. I feared watching it would give me another nightmare like last time when I showed up in the boardroom ready for casual Fridays and got dressed down by the Donald.)
What does it say about NBC's ratings that their sensationalized programming is starting to look like the late 90s FOX?
What does it say about NBC's ratings that their sensationalized programming is starting to look like the late 90s FOX?
Stone's 9-11 movie
From the looks of the preview, this is not the movie many were fearing Oliver Stone would make.
It looks to be a very localized account of the World Trade Center emergency responders and their families. The preview is very polished and moving.
Give it a look.
It looks to be a very localized account of the World Trade Center emergency responders and their families. The preview is very polished and moving.
Give it a look.
Tony Snow uses term "tar baby"
If you read the quote in context, its obvious Snow is not being intentionally racist.
Still, it's quite a snafu for the Press Secretary. I hope he has been informed as to why using the term is unaaceptable.
Still, it's quite a snafu for the Press Secretary. I hope he has been informed as to why using the term is unaaceptable.
Embarrassing, yes?
Rove indictment story commented on a few days ago comes from less than reliable source. I should have been very suspicious given the tremendous impact of the story and the fact that a small net outlet was the only one reporting on it.
My apologies to readers.
My apologies to readers.
Monday, May 15, 2006
"SNL" 5/13
Not so good. Yet again.
Tech Pack was great though. Al Gore was really good. "MySpace" skit was pretty funny. Jerry Seinfeld's performance was laughably bad. In a good way.
Overall, though, kinda blah.
Tech Pack was great though. Al Gore was really good. "MySpace" skit was pretty funny. Jerry Seinfeld's performance was laughably bad. In a good way.
Overall, though, kinda blah.
What if...?
What if you regularly contact a person by phone who, unbeknownst to you, is a suspected terrorist or terrorist sympathizer?
The NSA makes note of your ties. One day while leaving your house, you are picked up by men in sunglasses and suits. They take you to an undisclosed location, question you for days, find little compelling evidence, and return you home to your frightened family.
All this is, of course, constitutionally acceptable given the president's ability to effectively fight a war in any way he deems necessary?
Right?
The NSA makes note of your ties. One day while leaving your house, you are picked up by men in sunglasses and suits. They take you to an undisclosed location, question you for days, find little compelling evidence, and return you home to your frightened family.
All this is, of course, constitutionally acceptable given the president's ability to effectively fight a war in any way he deems necessary?
Right?
White House tracking reporters
According to a story published by ABC today.
Who's surprised? You give that much info and unchecked power to individuals, and unscrupulous or no, abuse will happen.
If you want to be really worried, look at some of the comments posted below the story by concerned Americans:
If journalists are targets, will the media's gloves come off? Will they shrink or wail on the admin.?
Who's surprised? You give that much info and unchecked power to individuals, and unscrupulous or no, abuse will happen.
If you want to be really worried, look at some of the comments posted below the story by concerned Americans:
I am a journalism graduate, UNC-Chapel Hill. I am also a veteran.
I hope they catch every government leaker of classified secret information and put them in prison for life. And any reporter publishing known classified secret information should be shot. It is called treason, not first amendment rights.
Posted by: Tom Camp | May 15, 2006 11:26:53 AM
If journalists are targets, will the media's gloves come off? Will they shrink or wail on the admin.?
The Right Brothers
Listen to their horrid blink-182/Jock Rock pastiche "Bush Was Right" at the above link. This also is not a parody.
You can listen to snippets of most of their music at this link.
I'm particularly fond of "You Can't Racial Profile":
Classy.
You can listen to snippets of most of their music at this link.
I'm particularly fond of "You Can't Racial Profile":
Well, I ain't never seen a grandma
Strap dynamite around her waist
Or put explosives in her slip-ons
And try to blow a plane to outerspace
As a matter of fact every terrorist act
That's taken place in the friendly sky
You must understand has been by an olived skinned man
Between 18 and 35
Chorus
You can't racial profile
We've got laws against that insensitive attack
And meanwhile, they can pull every granny out of line
You can poke 'em and prod 'em if they're yellow, black or white
But if they're Middle Eastern well you'd better treat 'em right
'Cause being politically correct is more important than saving lives
Well, last December coming home Christmas eve
My mom got stopped in Denver
He said, “You look awefully suspicious to me,
What's that in your bag there?
I think I'm gonna have to hold you a while”
While Khalid & Ahmud were whistling Jihad tunes
Laughing all the way down the aisle
Repeat Chorus
If a bunch of white men who looked just like me
Hijacked half a dozen flights
I'd expect the rest of you to do what you should do
And drag my butt right out of line
But you can't racial profile
We've got laws against that insensitive attack
And meanwhile, they can jerk every granny out of line
Well you can poke 'em and prod 'em if they're Doris or Dwight
But if they're Javive well you'd better treat 'em right
'Cause being politically correct is more important than saving lives
Being polically correct is more important than saving lives
Classy.
Al Gore on "SNL"
Here's a link.
Best line: "...anti-tornado and hurricane-machine."
Second best: "rogue glaciers."
Will he be our 44th prez?
Best line: "...anti-tornado and hurricane-machine."
Second best: "rogue glaciers."
Will he be our 44th prez?
It's about time
Conservative christian groups threaten to stay home at midterm elections.
Why?
The Republican party as a whole cares little about same-sex marriage. Ballot initiatives to redefine marriage on the state level and promises to "protect" marriage nationwide were classic wedge-issue politics. Elevate a devisive issue to national prmoinence, promise to adddress said issue, and watch the votes come pouring in.
The gay marriage furor was just a big, effective lever that was discarded after the votes were counted.
It seems everyone's abandoning the Bush ship these days. Thank goodness.
Why?
Some of President Bush's most influential conservative Christian allies are becoming openly critical of the White House and Republicans in Congress, warning that they will withhold their support in the midterm elections unless Congress does more to oppose same-sex marriage, obscenity and abortion.
The Republican party as a whole cares little about same-sex marriage. Ballot initiatives to redefine marriage on the state level and promises to "protect" marriage nationwide were classic wedge-issue politics. Elevate a devisive issue to national prmoinence, promise to adddress said issue, and watch the votes come pouring in.
The gay marriage furor was just a big, effective lever that was discarded after the votes were counted.
It seems everyone's abandoning the Bush ship these days. Thank goodness.
Whuh??
Where do these people come from?
Liberals are often called shrill and there are many instances where this adjective is fitting. The most shrill punditry these days, though, is coming from none other than Fox News.
Please click on the above link and marvel in all its wrongness. You will wish it was a parody. Fox News is a major cable broadcaster, for goodness sakes.
Ridiculous, inflammatory, and repulsive. Since when did good citizens become traitors?
Isn't it time for the trolls to go back to hiding under the bridges from whence they came?
Liberals are often called shrill and there are many instances where this adjective is fitting. The most shrill punditry these days, though, is coming from none other than Fox News.
Please click on the above link and marvel in all its wrongness. You will wish it was a parody. Fox News is a major cable broadcaster, for goodness sakes.
Ridiculous, inflammatory, and repulsive. Since when did good citizens become traitors?
Isn't it time for the trolls to go back to hiding under the bridges from whence they came?
Saturday, May 13, 2006
"Fast and the Furious 3" is a good movie?!!
That's what they are reporting over at Ain't It Cool News.
I'm glad to hear that. I had hopes after seeing the preview. I like racing movies and it would be great to see the always reliable Lucas Black have a hit.
One of the best young character actors out there. Whenever I see him on screen, I know I am going to enjoy the movie a little more.
Check out "Friday Night Lights," "Crazy in Alabama," and, of course, "Sling Blade," for a quick Black primer.
I'm glad to hear that. I had hopes after seeing the preview. I like racing movies and it would be great to see the always reliable Lucas Black have a hit.
One of the best young character actors out there. Whenever I see him on screen, I know I am going to enjoy the movie a little more.
Check out "Friday Night Lights," "Crazy in Alabama," and, of course, "Sling Blade," for a quick Black primer.
NSA program collecting anonymous data?
The NSA is only collecting phone numbers which are essentially anonymous strings of data.
Wrong.
A)How can the data ever be useful if they can't at some point match it up to a real name?
B)How easy is it to Google a phone number and come up with an actual person and address? Answer: Very Easy. Some numbers are trickier to track down via Google or the like--doing so used to be part of what I did for a living--but for those with a little money to blow, tracing a number back to an individual is easy.
Wrong.
A)How can the data ever be useful if they can't at some point match it up to a real name?
B)How easy is it to Google a phone number and come up with an actual person and address? Answer: Very Easy. Some numbers are trickier to track down via Google or the like--doing so used to be part of what I did for a living--but for those with a little money to blow, tracing a number back to an individual is easy.
Rove indictment imminent
Yep. It's coming this week.
Thank God. Let's hope his is not the first head to roll.
I'm not thankful for this because I have some sort of inexplicable hatred for the current administration. I am thankful because the current admin. is dishonest and doesn't understand the US Constution. The sooner we get them all out of office the quicker we can become a democracy again.
Thank God. Let's hope his is not the first head to roll.
I'm not thankful for this because I have some sort of inexplicable hatred for the current administration. I am thankful because the current admin. is dishonest and doesn't understand the US Constution. The sooner we get them all out of office the quicker we can become a democracy again.
Friday, May 12, 2006
"Poseidon"
Hardly a great movie, but it moves, has some very tense moments, and very good disaster effects.
It is one of the most violent PG-13 movies I've ever seen. [Spoiler Warning]I mean there's death everywhere when the ship flips upside down--people are burned to death by a giant fireball, electrocuted, crushed, and Federico gets impaled[Spoilers End].
The characterization is silly and the dialogue by the numbers. Very movie of the week. But if life imitates bad television, then maybe everything would shake out this way after all.
If you like disaster flicks, horror movies, Kurt Russell and/or Josh Lucas, then you should go see this one.
It is one of the most violent PG-13 movies I've ever seen. [Spoiler Warning]I mean there's death everywhere when the ship flips upside down--people are burned to death by a giant fireball, electrocuted, crushed, and Federico gets impaled[Spoilers End].
The characterization is silly and the dialogue by the numbers. Very movie of the week. But if life imitates bad television, then maybe everything would shake out this way after all.
If you like disaster flicks, horror movies, Kurt Russell and/or Josh Lucas, then you should go see this one.
Whoa! The wheels are coming off.
Apparently, the NSA revelations we heard are only the tip of the iceberg.
The stinky's gonna hit the oscillator.
The stinky's gonna hit the oscillator.
"I'm not going to defend the indefensible."
These were Newt Gringrich's words on Hannity and Colmes last night. He was speaking of course about the recent revelations of the NSA data collection methods.
If you read the transcript or watch the video at the above link, you will see that Gingrich isn't slamming the NSA program, but the way Bush has flipped and flopped on what exactly is taking place.
Still, Gingrich calling Bush out for lying--and doing it on Hannity--is surprising. I guess that 29% is really shaking things up in Washington.
The Hayden nomination hearings could get really ugly.
If you read the transcript or watch the video at the above link, you will see that Gingrich isn't slamming the NSA program, but the way Bush has flipped and flopped on what exactly is taking place.
Still, Gingrich calling Bush out for lying--and doing it on Hannity--is surprising. I guess that 29% is really shaking things up in Washington.
The Hayden nomination hearings could get really ugly.
"Long Ride Home"
For those of you who haven't discoverd Patty Griffin's music, do yourself a favor and go give one of her albums a listen. Singer/songwriter fans will fall in love with her music.
If I may put in a plug, public libraries are great places to try out a new CD to see if you would like to buy it. Support your local public library.
I encountered the Patty Griffin song "Long Ride Home" recently and the lyrics have stuck with me. Tremendously sad and beautiful.
Update: Earlier lyrics were wrong. Contained the line "I watched the stone set like a stone." Corrected above.
If I may put in a plug, public libraries are great places to try out a new CD to see if you would like to buy it. Support your local public library.
I encountered the Patty Griffin song "Long Ride Home" recently and the lyrics have stuck with me. Tremendously sad and beautiful.
Long black limousine
Shiniest car I've ever seen
The back seat is nice and clean
She rides as quiet as a dream
Someone dug a hole six long feet in the ground
I said goodbye to you and I threw my roses down
Ain't nothing left at all in the end of being proud
With me riding in this car, and you flying through the clouds
I've had some time to think about you
And watch the sun set like a stone
I've had some time to think about you
On the long ride home
One day I took your tiny hand
Put your finger in the wedding band
Your daddy gave a piece of land
We laid ourselves the best of plans
Forty years go by with someone laying in your bed
Forty years of things you say you wish you'd never said
How hard would it have been to say some kinder words instead
I wonder as I stare up at the sky turning red
I've had some time to think about you
And watch the sun set like a stone
I've had some time to think about you
On the long ride home
Headlights staring at the driveway
The house is dark as it can be
I go inside and all is silent
It seems as empty as the inside of me
I've had some time to think about you
And watch the sun set like a stone
I've had some time to think about you
On the long, on the long
Oh the long, on the long
On the long ride home
Update: Earlier lyrics were wrong. Contained the line "I watched the stone set like a stone." Corrected above.
NSA story getting more scary
I said I was skeptical yesterday that this whole program was largely benign.
Josh Marshall catches a bit of very important bit of info that rewards said skepticism:
This is all part of the larger eavesdropping program and the info gathered is being used in order to decide whose calls to listen to.
Some will say "I haven't done anything wrong. Why should I worry?"
Please go read the Constitution and then acquaint yourself with the phrases "abuse of power" and "police state."
Josh Marshall catches a bit of very important bit of info that rewards said skepticism:
Government access to call records is related to the previously disclosed eavesdropping program, sources said, because it helps the NSA choose its targets for listening. The mathematical techniques known as "link analysis" and "pattern analysis," they said, give grounds for suspicion that can result in further investigation.
"Let's say lots comes in and we don't see anything interesting," said a source who helped develop the technology. "Tomorrow we find out someone is communicating with a known terrorist. When you go back and look at the past data, there may be information that you missed. A pattern that was meaningless suddenly makes sense."
This is all part of the larger eavesdropping program and the info gathered is being used in order to decide whose calls to listen to.
Some will say "I haven't done anything wrong. Why should I worry?"
Please go read the Constitution and then acquaint yourself with the phrases "abuse of power" and "police state."
"When it was 29, that was a very good poll..."
According to a new Harris interactive poll, Bush's approval rating is at 29%.
It's good to see more of America finally catching up with those of us in the know.
"It was a very good poll."
It's good to see more of America finally catching up with those of us in the know.
"It was a very good poll."
Thursday, May 11, 2006
Tapping that
Is the NSA listening to your phone calls? Bush told us today that the NSA is not listening to the calls of "innocent" Americans. Nice choice of words.
What American at this point hasn't earned the right to be highly skeptical of the White House?
Call me skeptical.
What American at this point hasn't earned the right to be highly skeptical of the White House?
Call me skeptical.
"Lost" 5/10/06
So obviously Locke and Eko are being compelled by some outside force to do its bidding. The fact that Eko and Locke dreamed about events and people neither of them would know about points toward a larger force manipulating them both. Is it malignant or benign?
Last night's episode was one of my faves of the season. Was hoping Eko story would be more self-contained, but I guess everything is pointing toward the big picture at this point.
Libby's graphic revival and the autopsy tape were pretty chilling.
Awesome episode.
Last night's episode was one of my faves of the season. Was hoping Eko story would be more self-contained, but I guess everything is pointing toward the big picture at this point.
Libby's graphic revival and the autopsy tape were pretty chilling.
Awesome episode.
Wednesday, May 10, 2006
Just one mistake
One mistake by an individual or group can be overlooked and forgiven. But consistent failure points toward incomptence.
Another example of incompetence.
Another example of incompetence.
Tuesday, May 09, 2006
Rove indictment
David Shuster of MSNBC reports that Rove will likely be indicted within two weeks time.
HUD Secretary pulls back the curtain...
"Party of Death"
According to Ramesh Ponnuru, editor of National Review and author of a new book of the same title, this is an appropriate label for the Democratic party.
Which party, for the most part, fights tooth and nail against single payer health care? Which party believes that adequate health care is a privilege of the rich?
We know the answer.
Because of inadequate health care for many, this results.
That's right. We have one of the highest infant mortality rates among developed nations. It's time for those who believe in a culture of life to examine if their econmoic conservatism squares with their biblical mandate.
Which party, for the most part, fights tooth and nail against single payer health care? Which party believes that adequate health care is a privilege of the rich?
We know the answer.
Because of inadequate health care for many, this results.
That's right. We have one of the highest infant mortality rates among developed nations. It's time for those who believe in a culture of life to examine if their econmoic conservatism squares with their biblical mandate.
31%
A CBS/Gallup poll from the weekend finds Bush at a 31% approval rating. Certainly it cannot get any lower than this.
I talked to a member of that 31% this weekend. It quickly became apparent to me why he would not be moved and would remain a member of the "less than third."
I expressed to him my fears of a nuclear armed Iran, but then told him how I was worried about any attempt by this White House to rectify the situation. I mentioned their lies that led us into Iraq--lies from which Rumsfeld tried to distance himself last week--and how I did not trust the threat assessments given by the White House concerning Iran.
Even though the White House has backed down on claims of WMD in Iraq and claims of any substantial ties to al Qaeada, this friend of mine continued to claim that Iraq was both a nuclear threat and a collaborator in the WTC destruction. The "less than third" believe these things and it's why they will not be moved.
I talked to a member of that 31% this weekend. It quickly became apparent to me why he would not be moved and would remain a member of the "less than third."
I expressed to him my fears of a nuclear armed Iran, but then told him how I was worried about any attempt by this White House to rectify the situation. I mentioned their lies that led us into Iraq--lies from which Rumsfeld tried to distance himself last week--and how I did not trust the threat assessments given by the White House concerning Iran.
Even though the White House has backed down on claims of WMD in Iraq and claims of any substantial ties to al Qaeada, this friend of mine continued to claim that Iraq was both a nuclear threat and a collaborator in the WTC destruction. The "less than third" believe these things and it's why they will not be moved.
Some excerpts from Iran's letter
The Times of London presented some excerpts of Iran's letter.
It appears that the letter is not an attempt by Iran to "back down," but rather to criticize the US for its policies to the Middle East. Many of the points are valid, but as far as I can tell, the letter is no olive branch.
It appears that the letter is not an attempt by Iran to "back down," but rather to criticize the US for its policies to the Middle East. Many of the points are valid, but as far as I can tell, the letter is no olive branch.
Monday, May 08, 2006
Negroponte on Iran
Iran apparently offered an olive branch/ploy today, depending on who you listen to.
John Negreponte said he found the timing of Iran's letter suspicious given the fact that the UN is about to vote on sanctions against Iran. But wouldn't the threat of sanctions ideally lead to a Iran being more willing to talk, to negotiate. Are debilitating sanctions the only option at this point?
I haven't read any of the letter sent by Iran, but I found Negroponte's words discouraging. Shouldn't we be happy if the threat of sanctions leads to Iran backing down?
Also, Israel threatens to wipe Iran off the face of the earth if they strike Israel first. This kind of posturing, which Israel is far more able to follow through on than Iran at this point, is cheered on by Hannity. When Iran spoke in such a way they were viewed as demented and an eminent threat.
John Negreponte said he found the timing of Iran's letter suspicious given the fact that the UN is about to vote on sanctions against Iran. But wouldn't the threat of sanctions ideally lead to a Iran being more willing to talk, to negotiate. Are debilitating sanctions the only option at this point?
I haven't read any of the letter sent by Iran, but I found Negroponte's words discouraging. Shouldn't we be happy if the threat of sanctions leads to Iran backing down?
Also, Israel threatens to wipe Iran off the face of the earth if they strike Israel first. This kind of posturing, which Israel is far more able to follow through on than Iran at this point, is cheered on by Hannity. When Iran spoke in such a way they were viewed as demented and an eminent threat.
"Lost" fans...
Should check out this website.
It's some really clever promotion from the folks at ABC. It is part of a big summer mystery game they're running to give "Lost" fans something to do until September.
Also, give 1-877-HANSORG a call.
It's some really clever promotion from the folks at ABC. It is part of a big summer mystery game they're running to give "Lost" fans something to do until September.
Also, give 1-877-HANSORG a call.
CIA job opening
Bush's ability to get Hayden placed at the top of the CIA will be a strong indicator of how much pull he has left. There has been some public dissent within the GOP on the choice of Hayden. Will the party stand behind the president's controversial choice?
Why is the choice controversial? Because Hayden helped craft and defend the illegal NSA eavesdropping program.
Why is the choice controversial? Because Hayden helped craft and defend the illegal NSA eavesdropping program.
"SNL" 5/6/06
Some of this weekend's installment was painful. That sketch with Armisen and Hanks yelling at Dratch was so grating I had to change the channel.
The testicles video was bizarre, but hilarious. The highlight of the show.
The strongest skits of the night aired after Weekend Update for a change. "Colin's Place" was great and the Condoleeza Rice guest appearance was hilarious.
Tom Hanks was mediocre and like Steve Martin earlier this year, turned in a bad performance for a usually reliable veteran host.
The testicles video was bizarre, but hilarious. The highlight of the show.
The strongest skits of the night aired after Weekend Update for a change. "Colin's Place" was great and the Condoleeza Rice guest appearance was hilarious.
Tom Hanks was mediocre and like Steve Martin earlier this year, turned in a bad performance for a usually reliable veteran host.
"The Sopranos"
"You're doing a heckuva job, Brownie."
Best moment of last night's episode.
It was a pretty slow episode, but I really enjoyed it. Loved seeing Chris bond with the stray dog as he tripped the light fantastic. It was good seeing a softer side of Tony which he will inevitably have to shed or hold on to as some of the brewing conflicts reach a boil.
Best moment of last night's episode.
It was a pretty slow episode, but I really enjoyed it. Loved seeing Chris bond with the stray dog as he tripped the light fantastic. It was good seeing a softer side of Tony which he will inevitably have to shed or hold on to as some of the brewing conflicts reach a boil.
Saturday, May 06, 2006
"Inifinite Crisis"
Another crisis has come and gone in the DC Universe. (Plastic Man to Superman: "See you at the next crisis,...")
Issue #7 was kind of a let down, although I thought Lex's demise was pretty cool. In some ways, the Villains United one-shot made for a better climax.
Given the longstanding rumors that Batman and his ward(s) are gay, wasn't it hilarious that they were all going off for a cruise together.
Marvel's "Civil War" looks to be pretty fun. Loved watching Captain America go all vigilante and taking down those SHIELD agents.
Issue #7 was kind of a let down, although I thought Lex's demise was pretty cool. In some ways, the Villains United one-shot made for a better climax.
Given the longstanding rumors that Batman and his ward(s) are gay, wasn't it hilarious that they were all going off for a cruise together.
Marvel's "Civil War" looks to be pretty fun. Loved watching Captain America go all vigilante and taking down those SHIELD agents.
Porter Goss resigns
That sure was sudden.
The money's on the fact that he's connected to the growing Washingtong hooker scandal.
Some of the members of the party of values can't get it for free, I guess.
The money's on the fact that he's connected to the growing Washingtong hooker scandal.
Some of the members of the party of values can't get it for free, I guess.
Wednesday, May 03, 2006
"Mission Impossible III"
Great movie. Saw a preview last night. JJ Abrams is a master of action, plotting, and characterization. Phillip Seymour Hoffman is good and nasty and Tom Cruise delivers the leading man goods better than in any of his films since "Jerry Maguire."
Barring an amazing interpretation of the Superman mythos from Bryan Singer, you will not see a better action movie this summer.
I'm kinda jaded toward action filmmaking, but this one was smashing and had me nervously grabbing my wife's leg as we watched Ethan Hunt careen down the side of a Shanghai highrise.
Amazing.
Barring an amazing interpretation of the Superman mythos from Bryan Singer, you will not see a better action movie this summer.
I'm kinda jaded toward action filmmaking, but this one was smashing and had me nervously grabbing my wife's leg as we watched Ethan Hunt careen down the side of a Shanghai highrise.
Amazing.
Opus Dei
The villains of "DaVinci" were recently given a thorough examination by "Time" magazine.
Time unfortunately doesn't include any of the information about their ninja-esque super assassins.
Time unfortunately doesn't include any of the information about their ninja-esque super assassins.
DaVinci hoax?
Lil' Opie Cunningham on May 19th will reignite the DaVinci code controversy. The good folks at Christianity Today offer up a host of articles that examine the fact and fiction of Dan Brown's mega-bestseller.
Making money by sitting on your a**
Yes. Your dream job has arrived. MMORPGs (Massive Multi-player Online Role Playing Games) have long concerned the development and hording of capital and skill points. Now, thanks to Swedish game developers MindArk, players of the game "Entropia" can turn money earned in the game's sci-fi world into real cash. Seriously.
Not surprisingly, the game is beginning to encourage actual investment of real world capital in the virtual world:
As the old saying goes, "You have to spend spice to earn spice."
Thanks to my wife for the heads up.
Not surprisingly, the game is beginning to encourage actual investment of real world capital in the virtual world:
For instance Jon Jacobs, known online as Neverdie, a 39-year-old Entropia player in Miami Beach, last year sold almost everything he owned (real and virtual) to scratch together $100,000 (1 million P.E.D.'s) to buy a huge space station in the game. By selling apartments and storefronts to other players and by imposing taxes on players' hunting and mining on his real estate, he is now making about $12,000 a month on his investment, he estimates. And his big nightclub is still under construction.
As the old saying goes, "You have to spend spice to earn spice."
Thanks to my wife for the heads up.
Colbert clips
Thanks to Solipsistic reader "willisdrummond"--we can only hope that the chosen alias means that Todd Bridges is actually a regular reader--you can click on the below links to watch Stephen Colbert's stunning performance in Washington:
Part 1
Part 2
Part 3
The video is broken up into parts due to its large size.
Part 1
Part 2
Part 3
The video is broken up into parts due to its large size.
302nd posting!
Here it is! We've surpassed 300. I'd like to give a shout out to my production team. Couldn't have made it here without you guys.
Onward and upward.
Onward and upward.
Monday, May 01, 2006
"Mission Accomplished" G. Gordon Liddy style
May 1, 2003--Bush, with the help of a giant banner, gave the impression that the war in Iraq was entering its final days.
Conservative radio host G. Gordon Liddy offered some hilarious commentary on that day three years ago:
I love ex-con Liddy obsesssing over Bush's package and then claiming that the size of Bush's junk will drive the ladies crazy. Wrong on so many levels.
Liddy quote via Atrios.
Conservative radio host G. Gordon Liddy offered some hilarious commentary on that day three years ago:
Well, I -- in the first place, I think it's envy. I mean, after all, Al Gore had to go get some woman to tell him how to be a man. And here comes George Bush. You know, he's in his flight suit, he's striding across the deck, and he's wearing his parachute harness, you know -- and I've worn those because I parachute -- and it makes the best of his manly characteristic. You go run those -- run that stuff again of him walking across there with the parachute. He has just won every woman's vote in the United States of America. You know, all those women who say size doesn't count -- they're all liars. Check that out.
I love ex-con Liddy obsesssing over Bush's package and then claiming that the size of Bush's junk will drive the ladies crazy. Wrong on so many levels.
Liddy quote via Atrios.
More Colbert
Stephen Colbert was also profiled on "60 Minutes" Sunday night. This guy's everywhere.
Did anyone catch his recent interview with William Kristol? He got Kristol to talk about his membership in PNAC. The People for a New American Century (PNAC), of course, pushed hard for invading Iraq long before 9-11 and even Bush entered office. When Bush entered office, he brought along many PNAC folks with him and... surprise, surprise, we inavded Iraq.
The press likes to treat PNAC as some lefty conspiracy theory, but it exists and reading its long stated agenda further helps deflate the idea that we went to war with Iraq because of 9-11. (Of course, I don't know if many folks believe that at this point.)
Why do Colbert and John Stewart do some of the best political reporting on the air? They are a frickin' comedy show. Often Stewart and Colbert are the only ones speaking truth to power. The press often acts as a gigantic PR firm regurgitating press releases. Our democracy becomes f'ed up if the press isn't doing its part.
Did anyone catch his recent interview with William Kristol? He got Kristol to talk about his membership in PNAC. The People for a New American Century (PNAC), of course, pushed hard for invading Iraq long before 9-11 and even Bush entered office. When Bush entered office, he brought along many PNAC folks with him and... surprise, surprise, we inavded Iraq.
The press likes to treat PNAC as some lefty conspiracy theory, but it exists and reading its long stated agenda further helps deflate the idea that we went to war with Iraq because of 9-11. (Of course, I don't know if many folks believe that at this point.)
Why do Colbert and John Stewart do some of the best political reporting on the air? They are a frickin' comedy show. Often Stewart and Colbert are the only ones speaking truth to power. The press often acts as a gigantic PR firm regurgitating press releases. Our democracy becomes f'ed up if the press isn't doing its part.
It was a big Colbert weekend
Stephen Colbert spoke at White House Correspondents Dinner this weekend and turned in an impressive performance. He stood right next to the president and in "Colbert Report" style, gave Bush many a backhanded compliment. He also grilled te press for failing to cover the White House with much credibility.
You can find the full transcript here.
Here's some choice quotes:
And:
You can find the full transcript here.
Here's some choice quotes:
I'm a simple man with a simple mind. I hold a simple set of beliefs that I live by. Number one, I believe in America. I believe it exists. My gut tells me I live there. I feel that it extends from the Atlantic to the Pacific, and I strongly believe it has 50 states. And I cannot wait to see how the Washington Post spins that one tomorrow. I believe in democracy. I believe democracy is our greatest export. At least until China figures out a way to stamp it out of plastic for three cents a unit.
In fact, Ambassador Zhou Wenzhong, welcome. Your great country makes our Happy Meals possible. I said it's a celebration. I believe the government that governs best is the government that governs least. And by these standards, we have set up a fabulous government in Iraq.
I believe in pulling yourself up by your own bootstraps. I believe it is possible -- I saw this guy do it once in Cirque du Soleil. It was magical. And though I am a committed Christian, I believe that everyone has the right to their own religion, be you Hindu, Jewish or Muslim. I believe there are infinite paths to accepting Jesus Christ as your personal savior.
And:
But the rest of you, what are you thinking, reporting on NSA wiretapping or secret prisons in eastern Europe? Those things are secret for a very important reason: they're super-depressing. And if that's your goal, well, misery accomplished. Over the last five years you people were so good -- over tax cuts, WMD intelligence, the effect of global warming. We Americans didn't want to know, and you had the courtesy not to try to find out. Those were good times, as far as we knew.
But, listen, let's review the rules. Here's how it works: the president makes decisions. He's the decider. The press secretary announces those decisions, and you people of the press type those decisions down. Make, announce, type. Just put 'em through a spell check and go home. Get to know your family again. Make love to your wife. Write that novel you got kicking around in your head. You know, the one about the intrepid Washington reporter with the courage to stand up to the administration. You know - fiction!
Because really, what incentive do these people have to answer your questions, after all? I mean, nothing satisfies you. Everybody asks for personnel changes. So the White House has personnel changes. Then you write, "Oh, they're just rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic." First of all, that is a terrible metaphor. This administration is not sinking. This administration is soaring. If anything, they are rearranging the deck chairs on the Hindenburg!
Wow!
Thought I was reading a Z Mag piece or a Chomsky pamphlet when I saw the first sentence of this piece from the Boston Globe:
As we have talked about before, Bush is actively claiming the power to interpret the constitution as he sees fit. With a quiet congress and a Supreme Court not ruling on Bush's interpretations, we are left with a monarchy and an evaporating constitution. This is not Z Mag crazy talk. This is what is happening.
President Bush has quietly claimed the authority to disobey more than 750 laws enacted since he took office, asserting that he has the power to set aside any statute passed by Congress when it conflicts with his interpretation of the Constitution.
As we have talked about before, Bush is actively claiming the power to interpret the constitution as he sees fit. With a quiet congress and a Supreme Court not ruling on Bush's interpretations, we are left with a monarchy and an evaporating constitution. This is not Z Mag crazy talk. This is what is happening.